With public meetings canceled, federal, state agencies offer varying guidances for weighing in on environmental issues

In late March, the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe sent a letter to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation requesting that the agency delay a public comment period for a controversial and complicated project to do maintenance on the Truckee Canal, a manmade diversion off the Truckee River. 

In the letter, the tribe asked to reschedule public workshops and government-to-goverment consultation with the agency, responsible for managing dams and diversions across the West.

But the agency denied the request.

In a letter responding to the tribe, the Bureau of Reclamation’s Area Manager, Terri Edwards, declined to push back the April 20 public comment period. She noted that the federal agency had instead created an opportunity for virtual public comment to weigh in on an environmental analysis for the Truckee Canal project and offered to conduct a consultation remotely.

“We have told Reclamation numerous times since that letter that we don’t think that a video conference or a telephone conference with the council would suffice under their obligation to hold government-to-government consultation,” said Chris Mixson, an attorney for the tribe.

The tribe was hardly the only party that objected to the bureau’s decision. Officials with the City of Fernley also wanted Reclamation to push back the comment deadline due to the measures taken to prevent the spread of COVID-19: limiting public meetings and encouraging residents to stay at home. When Reclamation denied the requests, Fernley sued in federal court.

“Non-essential governmental and legal proceedings of all types have been placed on hold, and deadlines have been tolled,” lawyers for Fernley wrote on April 9. “Despite this, and the fact other federal agencies have already granted COVID-19 extensions for public comment periods, Reclamation denied numerous requests to extend its April 20, 2020, deadline…”

The lawsuit highlights an issue that has frustrated everyone from local municipalities to tribes and environmental groups. What should state and federal agencies, responsible for collecting public comments on major decisions, do when they can no longer convene the public in person? Even if the public can comment online, is it a sufficient alternative during a public health crisis?

State and federal agencies have offered mixed messages on how they intend to move forward. But in most cases, agencies are approaching the issue on a case-by-case basis. 

The public comment process is a key part of the process for analyzing the environmental impacts of actions, from permitting mines to leasing oil and gas, on federal land. With federal land comprising about 85 percent of the state, many of these decisions are closely watched.

“Public comment periods are an incredibly important tool for ensuring that the public has a role in making federal decisions with significant environmental, economic, and cultural impacts,”Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto and Sen. Jacky Rosen wrote to the Department of Interior on April 3. 

In the letter, the senators requested that the agency, which includes the Bureau of Reclamation, extend open public comment periods indefinitely and postpone future public comment periods.

But the department did not issue any overarching policy. Instead, 10 days later, it offered guidance for bureaus within the department, including on virtual public comment meetings. 

As Reclamation moves forward with the canal project, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), which manages about 65 percent of the state’s land, is looking at it on a “case-by-case basis.”

“Our actions, such as comment periods and lease sales, are being evaluated on a case-by-case basis and adjustments are being made to ensure we are allowing for appropriate public input, while protecting the health and safety of the public and our employees,” said Chris Rose, a spokesman for the state office, noting that the BLM was taking comment through mail or email. 

Agencies often have to walk a fine line. If they do not provide ample opportunity for the public to  comment on governmental action and permitting, they could face litigation to undo a decision.

And the issues are not only on the federal level. 

On April 10, three groups — the Center for Biological Diversity, Great Basin Resource Watch and the Center for Biological Diversity — wrote to Gov. Steve Sisolak asking the governor to cease public comment periods for mines and suspend permitting during the COVID-19 process. 

“Amid this global crisis, permitting mines has continued unhindered despite the fact that the public can not be reasonably expected to engage in ongoing public comment periods,” the groups wrote in a letter. “Many who would normally engage in commenting are in crisis as infection rates rise, and we reach record levels of unemployment.”

In the letter, the groups identified another issue that hampers the ability of groups, especially in rural communities, to weigh in on governmental decisions: limited access to the internet. 

Fernley raised a similar issue in its lawsuit over public comment for the Truckee Canal project. It argued that domestic well owners, with limited access to the internet, might be shut out from the process. But the agency argued in court filings that in-person meetings were not mandatory. 

And on Friday, federal District Court Judge Miranda Du agreed.

Du dismissed the case and wrote in her order that “contrary to Fernley’s argument, the duties it seeks to impose on Reclamation are discretionary, rather than mandatory.” 

Setting sail into a new world of journalism

Welcome aboard The Nevada Independent.

We are about to embark on a grand journalistic adventure, and we want you along for the ride. This is your state, your news, your voice.

Over a span of three decades, I have done everything I have wanted to do in journalism and more. From night reporter to columnist to TV host, I have approached this wonderful profession with passion and zeal. I have interviewed local and national politicians, met hundreds of interesting people and loved every phase.

Now, it’s time for a new one.

I decided earlier this year to try the one job I have always mused about, the one role I have wanted as a career capstone: editor. So during the last six months or so, with the help of my marvelous managing editor, Elizabeth Thompson, we have built something out of nothing, the site you are on right now.

This is the culmination of 30 years of covering what a friend of mine used to call the only game for adults, the endlessly fascinating movement of chess pieces in a match where the stakes are high and the consequences are real. It is a contest where human foibles eventually will be exposed, where the fittest don’t always survive, where the ends often do not justify the means.

One eternal truism about politics is that it is everywhere – in all governments, in policy issues, in personal relationships. To truly understand why things are happening in an ever more complex world, especially in one where trust is fading and truth is evanescent, you have to understand all aspects: the people, the issues and, yes, the politics.

That’s where we come in.

We are committed to go where no news source in Nevada has gone before: To assemble the best team of journalists in the state and to cover issues important to the public with depth, with insight and with transparency.

I have already told you a little about <a href="https://preview.thenevadaindependent.com/article/from-the-editor/">our mission</a>. Our name is not just a name; it is a promise.

The fantastic team I have assembled, the most formidable group of reporters in Nevada, will be truly independent. They are beholden to no one and dedicated to only one purpose, which is to provide you with the best coverage of politics and public policy in state history.

When I conceived of this venture in the middle of 2015, I had three reporters in mind to form the core of our coverage of the Legislature. And I could not be happier that this trio – Michelle Rindels, Megan Messerly and Riley Snyder – will be blanketing the Legislative Building until sine die, showing you not just what is happening but why it is happening. These are the finest reporters in the state, and I am lucky to have them.

We will not neglect Las Vegas during the next 120 days, with the creative and talented Jackie Valley covering everything from education to gaming to municipalities. TNI also is fortunate to have recruited two superb columnists from different sides of the political spectrum – John L. Smith and Orrin Johnson – to opine about topics familiar and otherwise, to bring distinct voices to an often homogenized commentariat.

We will provide timely surveys from one of the best in the buisienss, Mark Mellman, who knows Nevada, the people, the issues. We also have a few surprises in store, including a special correspondent we will unveil on Sunday whose first column will rattle cages and provoke action. Her contributions to TNI will have an impact from Nevada to Washington, DC.

But the most important part of The Nevada Independent will be our readers. Yes, we have to make the ultimate decisions on what to cover and how to write about a panoply of topics. But we want – nay, need – your help.

Whether it’s as simple as commenting on a story or opinion piece or participating in a Facebook Live chat with me or penning an op-ed, you are an essential part of our mission. We want you to make us better. We hope you will tell us where we have gone right and where we have done wrong.

This is a new role for me, too, and I ask for your patience. Some of you out there may know me as a hard-hitting reporter and commentator. That is all I have known for 30 years.

I come to this new incarnation as a tabula rasa, eager to learn, prepared to stumble and excited to evolve. I ask of you only to put aside any preconceived notions, to clean your slate, too, as you judge this new enterprise.

We will make mistakes. But we will correct them as soon as we discover them, and we will explain why we made them.

As we point out relationships among elected officials and lobbyists and special interests, we will be transparent about our own. Our work, I hope, will always stand on its merits, but we will give you all the information so you can judge for yourself.

I have never been more excited about anything in my professional career, not so much because I have confidence in my own abilities but because of this once-in-a-lifetime team that will make me look good every day. This is really about them.

It is truly an honor to be at the helm of a ship staffed by so many stars. I have thought many times about how I would have done things differently if I were in charge of a news organization. “If only I were the editor…” I mused. Well, now I am.

Welcome aboard TNI, folks. It’s going to be quite a ride. Thanks for coming along with us.